ASUS XG27ACS vs LG 27GR83Q-B: Which 1440p Gaming Monitor Fits Your Setup?
The LG is the connectivity and refresh-rate choice: its 240Hz panel and HDMI 2.1 make the premium easier to justify for high-frame-rate PC gaming or current consoles. The ASUS is the laptop-desk choice: its USB-C DP Alt Mode and ergonomics are useful, and RTINGS reports sharp motion, but it gives up the 240Hz ceiling and HDMI 2.1. Neither monitor is a dark-room HDR specialist.
Published by Pickoryx · Published 2026-09-25
Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Products compared

Product A · ASIN B0CV24GQ9W
ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS 27-inch 1440p 180Hz USB-C Gaming Monitor
Last observed offer
$229.00
Per listed package.
Offer eligibility must be confirmed on Amazon.
Checked 2026-10-19 19:05 UTC. Price and availability may change.

Product B · ASIN B0C63HDHPR
LG 27GR83Q-B.AUS 27-inch QHD 240Hz UltraGear Gaming Monitor
Last observed offer
$289.90 List Price: $499.99
Per listed package.
Offer eligibility must be confirmed on Amazon.
Checked 2026-10-19 19:07 UTC. Price and availability may change.
Pickoryx may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through the paid Amazon links on this page, at no added cost to you.
The buying question
Is the LG 27GR83Q-B.AUS 240Hz and HDMI 2.1 combination worth its premium over the ASUS XG27ACS 180Hz model with USB-C video?
LG buys a higher refresh ceiling and HDMI 2.1; ASUS buys USB-C laptop connectivity and RTINGS-tested sharp motion at a lower tier. Both are IPS HDR400 displays with weak dark-room contrast.
Quick verdict
Choose ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS 27-inch 1440p 180Hz USB-C Gaming Monitor if
- You want video over USB-C from a laptop and a monitor stand with tilt, swivel, pivot and height adjustment.
- Your games or GPU target 180Hz or below and you prefer the ASUS feature set at the lower current-price context.
- You play in a bright room and do not need HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
Choose LG 27GR83Q-B.AUS 27-inch QHD 240Hz UltraGear Gaming Monitor if
- You want 240Hz over DisplayPort or HDMI and your system can feed it.
- You use PS5, Xbox Series X|S or another HDMI 2.1 source.
- You accept IPS-level dark-room blacks in exchange for speed and connection bandwidth.
When the recommendation changes
- The live ASIN maps to a different regional or panel variant.
- The current offer gap changes materially at review time.
- A future bilateral test changes the refresh, motion or HDR trade-offs.
The differences that matter
Refresh Rate And Motion
What this changes: LG is the better fit when the system can sustain frame rates near 240Hz and the buyer values the smoother ceiling. RTINGS also reports sharper tested motion for ASUS, so the refresh-rate advantage is not a universal motion-quality verdict.[4]
Hdmi 2 1 Console Use
What this changes: Choose LG for a console or HDMI-connected PC where HDMI 2.1 bandwidth matters. ASUS remains usable over HDMI, but its HDMI 2.0 ceiling is the relevant limitation.[1, 2, 4]
Usb C And Ergonomics
What this changes: ASUS is the more direct one-cable laptop choice because its Type-C port carries video. LG offers the more conventional gaming-monitor connection set and comparable stand adjustments; do not assume its USB ports replace a USB-C dock.[1, 2]
Hdr Dark Room Picture
What this changes: Neither monitor is a strong dark-room HDR upgrade. Treat HDR400 as a compatibility/format feature here and choose by room lighting, refresh and connectivity instead of expecting deep blacks.[4, 5, 6]
Best for your routine
240Hz competitive PC gaming
Best fit: LG 27GR83Q-B.AUS 27-inch QHD 240Hz UltraGear Gaming Monitor
LG offers the higher documented refresh ceiling and RTINGS identifies 240Hz as its core advantage over the ASUS in this tier.
Laptop desk with one USB-C video cable
Best fit: ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS 27-inch 1440p 180Hz USB-C Gaming Monitor
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
ASUS documents Type-C DP Alt Mode and a USB hub, while LG’s listed connections do not document USB-C video input.
Current-gen console or HDMI 2.1 PC connection
Best fit: LG 27GR83Q-B.AUS 27-inch QHD 240Hz UltraGear Gaming Monitor
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
LG documents HDMI 2.1 and RTINGS says it supports the max refresh and current-gen console bandwidth over HDMI.
Dark-room HDR movie and gaming picture
No clear winner
RTINGS reports low contrast, no local dimming and limited HDR for both; neither has a tested picture-quality advantage that resolves this use case.
Value and trade-offs
One or both observed offers have eligibility conditions, so no unrestricted price difference is shown.
The LG premium is justified only when 240Hz and HDMI 2.1 change the buyer’s connection or gaming target. ASUS value is stronger when USB-C video and a lower current offer matter; this interpretation uses the dated catalog context in the research ledger, not a public price promise.
Price observations are short and must be refreshed at review time; there is not enough history for a definite Buy Now or Wait recommendation.
Limitations
- This is a source-based comparison; Pickoryx did not perform hands-on testing.
- RTINGS measurements and category placement apply to its tested units and methodology; they do not guarantee every panel batch or game.
- The live catalog ASINs were matched to XG27ACS and 27GR83Q-B.AUS, but retailer packages and regional accessories can change.
- Current price and availability are dated context and not a 30-, 90- or 365-day low.
- No long-term reliability, warranty-service or defect-rate winner is claimed.
Questions shoppers ask
Is the LG 27GR83Q-B.AUS faster than the ASUS XG27ACS?
It has the higher maximum refresh rate, 240Hz versus 180Hz. RTINGS also reports sharp motion and low input lag on both, and its bilateral roundup says the ASUS can have sharper tested motion, so refresh ceiling and motion handling should be treated as separate decisions.
Which monitor is better for PS5 or Xbox Series X|S?
LG is the better fit when HDMI 2.1 bandwidth matters: LG documents HDMI 2.1 and RTINGS says it supports current-gen consoles over HDMI. ASUS works with consoles but lacks HDMI 2.1 bandwidth.
Does ASUS USB-C charge a laptop?
The source set establishes Type-C DP Alt Mode for video and a USB hub. It does not establish a laptop charging-power level, so treat ASUS as a one-cable video and peripheral convenience rather than assume full laptop charging.
Which one has better HDR in a dark room?
Neither is a strong dark-room HDR choice in the tested evidence. RTINGS reports low contrast, no local dimming and limited HDR for both models.
Methodology and sources
Compared refresh and tested motion, HDMI 2.1 console bandwidth, USB-C and stand ergonomics, and HDR/dark-room limitations, then translated the differences into use-case-specific choices.
Structured drafting used the assigned candidate, live product identity and dated price context as inputs; model claims were checked against opened official and independent sources.
View 6 sources
- 1.ROG Strix XG27ACS USB Type-C Gaming MonitorASUS ROG USA · Official support · Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Product overview: 27-inch 2560x1440, 180Hz, Fast IPS, USB Type-C DP video/hub; Versatile Connectivity; Compact Design, Ergonomic Comfort: Exact ASUS model page identifies XG27ACS and documents 27-inch 2560x1440 Fast IPS, 180Hz, HDR/DisplayHDR 400, Type-C DP Alt Mode, HDMI 2.0, DP 1.4, and tilt/swivel/pivot/height adjustment.
- 2.LG 27 Inch UltraGear QHD 1440P 1ms 240Hz Gaming MonitorLG USA · Official support · Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Product overview and features: 27GR83Q-B, QHD IPS, 240Hz, HDR400, HDMI 2.1, DisplayPort, USB, height/pivot/tilt stand: Exact LG base-model page documents 27-inch QHD 2560x1440 IPS, 1ms GTG, 240Hz, DCI-P3 95% typical with DisplayHDR 400, HDMI 2.1, DP, USB and height/pivot/tilt stand.
- 3.27GR83Q-B.AUS Product Support PageLG USA · Official support · Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Support heading and product label: 27GR83Q-B.AUS: LG support page confirms the exact regional suffix 27GR83Q-B.AUS used by the live catalog item and links the owner documentation for that model.
- 4.The 6 Best G-SYNC Monitors of 2026RTINGS.com · Independent testing · Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Best Lower Mid-Range G-SYNC Monitor (LG 27GR83Q-B) and Best Budget G-SYNC Monitor (ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS), lines 213-324: RTINGS places both exact models in adjacent buyer tiers and states the bilateral trade-offs: LG 240Hz and HDMI 2.1; ASUS 180Hz without HDMI 2.1; ASUS sharper motion in its testing; both similar bright-room behavior and low-contrast HDR limitations. This is qualitative tested-product evidence and a demand signal, not search volume.
- 5.ASUS ROG Strix XG27ACS ReviewRTINGS.com · Independent testing · Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Differences Between Sizes and Variants; PC/Console/Office/HDR sections; Test Bench 2.1.2: Exact-model RTINGS review identifies the XG27ACS 180Hz variant, describes sharp motion and low input lag, confirms no HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, Type-C DP Alt Mode, ergonomic stand, low contrast and limited HDR.
- 6.LG 27GR83Q-B ReviewRTINGS.com · Independent testing · Source checked 2026-09-26 00:00 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Differences Between Sizes and Variants; PC/Console/HDR sections: Exact-model RTINGS review says it tested the only 27-inch 27GR83Q-B, identifies 240Hz/1440p IPS, HDMI 2.1 and VRR, responsive motion, and low-contrast/limited HDR behavior.