Nikon Z 40mm f/2 vs DX 24mm f/1.7: Choose for Your Camera and Composition
Choose the DX 24mm for a wider view on your DX camera, especially when you cannot step back. Choose the regular 40mm for tighter framing or to retain full-frame coverage on an FX body; accept its narrower DX view.
Published by Pickoryx · Published 2026-10-09
Source checked 2026-10-09 05:11 UTC
Products compared

Product A · ASIN B09G57BXZ4
Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (regular, non-SE)
Last observed offer
$226.95 List Price: $276.95
Per listed package.
Checked 2026-10-19 16:39 UTC. Price and availability may change.

Product B · ASIN B0C6P4CTTT
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 24mm f/1.7
Last observed offer
$266.95
Per listed package.
Offer eligibility must be confirmed on Amazon.
Checked 2026-10-19 16:41 UTC. Price and availability may change.
Pickoryx may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through the paid Amazon links on this page, at no added cost to you.
The buying question
Do you need a wider view on DX, a tighter composition, or full-frame coverage when using FX?
The 24mm fits more into a DX frame; the 40mm gives a tighter DX view while retaining FX coverage.
Quick verdict
Choose Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (regular, non-SE) if
- You want a tighter composition or need full FX image-area coverage.
Choose Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 24mm f/1.7 if
- Including more of the scene on DX matters more than full-frame coverage.
When the recommendation changes
- A firm requirement for the full FX image area rules out the DX24 for that job.
- If full-frame use is only hypothetical, choose the framing you need now.
The differences that matter
Dx Composition
Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (regular, non-SE)
40mm; Nikon specifies 38°50′ on DX.[1]
Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 24mm f/1.7
24mm; Nikon specifies 61° on DX.[2]
What this changes: On the same DX camera from the same position, the 24mm includes more of the scene. Choose it for groups or interiors when backing up is limited; choose the 40mm when you want the tighter composition.[1, 2]
Fx Image Area Coverage
Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (regular, non-SE)
FX-format coverage; Nikon lists FX and DX as compatible formats.[1]
What this changes: A requirement to retain the full-frame image area favors the 40mm. If you stay on DX, that coverage advantage need not outweigh the 24mm’s wider framing.[1, 2, 3]
Best for your routine
DX group photos in a room with limited backing-up space
Best fit: Nikon NIKKOR Z DX 24mm f/1.7
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
Its wider stated angle admits more of the scene; accept the DX crop for later FX use.
DX compositions where a narrower view is the goal
Best fit: Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (regular, non-SE)
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
The 40mm suits that framing preference, but can be restrictive for wider scenes.
One lens that must retain the full FX image area
Best fit: Nikon NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (regular, non-SE)
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
The 40mm covers FX; the DX24 invokes the documented crop.
Value and trade-offs
One or both observed offers have eligibility conditions, so no unrestricted price difference is shown.
If either costs more, judge that premium against the composition or image-area requirement it solves.
Verified price history is unavailable, so purchase timing remains unresolved.
Limitations
- This specification-based comparison is not a hands-on test. Sharpness, autofocus speed, low-light image quality and background-blur superiority remain unranked.
- The named formats do not guarantee every function on every Nikon Z camera. Check your exact camera documentation; Nikon’s DX24 guide calls for current camera firmware.
Questions shoppers ask
How can I choose if I only own a DX camera?
If your existing zoom covers both focal lengths, try it at 24mm and 40mm from your usual shooting positions. Choose the composition that works for your subjects; possible future FX use need not decide today’s purchase.
Is the DX24 incompatible with FX?
No. Nikon lists FX compatibility, but its guide specifies a DX image area with fewer recorded pixels and focus points. Mount compatibility and full-frame coverage are different requirements.
Which exact versions does this comparison cover?
Nikon model 20102 is the regular, non-SE 40mm f/2; model 20119 is the DX24mm f/1.7. Match those model numbers and check whether an offer is a single lens or a bundle.
Methodology and sources
Compared framing on the same DX format separately from image-area coverage on FX.
AI-assisted research organized the specifications and buying guidance.
View 3 sources
- 1.NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 (20102), Nikon USANikon · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-09 05:11 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Tech Specs: Format; DX/FX Maximum Angle of View; Focal Length; Mount Type; Maximum Aperture: Regular FX 40mm prime, Nikon Z mount, f/2; DX angle 38°50′ and FX angle 57°.
- 2.NIKKOR Z DX 24mm f/1.7 (20119), Nikon USANikon · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-09 05:11 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Tech Specs: Format; Maximum Angle of View (DX-format); Focal Length; Mount Type; Maximum Aperture: DX 24mm prime, Nikon Z mount, f/1.7; DX angle 61°.
- 3.NIKKOR Z DX 24mm f/1.7 Reference GuideNikon · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-09 05:11 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Printed p3 Before You Begin; p15 Cautions: Taking Photographs; p21 Specifications: FX cameras use DX image area, reducing recorded pixels and focus points. Consult camera documentation and use current firmware.