Anker 737 vs UGREEN PB205: Port Profiles and Carry Weight Compared
Choose by your device plan first: Anker lists up to 140W on either USB-C port individually, with a 140W total-output cap; UGREEN lists up to 140W on C1 and 65W on C2. UGREEN’s published weight is 513 g versus 630 g for Anker. These ratings and weights do not establish real-world charging speed, simultaneous output, or usable battery runtime.
Published by Pickoryx · Published 2026-10-19
Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Products compared
Product A · ASIN B09VPHVT2Z
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289
Last observed offer
$109.99
Per listed package.
Offer eligibility must be confirmed on Amazon.
Checked 2026-10-19 16:47 UTC. Price and availability may change.
Product B · ASIN B0BJQ7F16T
UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
Last observed offer
$79.99 List Price: $99.99
Per listed package.
Offer eligibility must be confirmed on Amazon.
Checked 2026-10-19 09:43 UTC. Price and availability may change.
Pickoryx may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through the paid Amazon links on this page, at no added cost to you.
The buying question
Which of these exact models better fits the ports and per-port output profiles their devices call for, and how much carry weight matters?
The Anker lists a 140W maximum on each USB-C port, within a 140W total-output cap; the UGREEN lists 140W on C1 and 65W on C2, while weighing less in its published specification.
Quick verdict
Choose Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289 if
- A device you plan to connect to Anker USB-C2 calls for a listed profile above UGREEN’s 65W C2 maximum, and you have checked the simultaneous-output table for your exact device combination.
Choose UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A if
- You value the lower manufacturer-listed weight and your planned devices fit the UGREEN’s published per-port ceilings.
When the recommendation changes
- Your actual devices need different USB-C profiles or simultaneous output combinations; check those against the manufacturers’ tables before buying.
- The 117 g listed weight difference matters less to you than the Anker’s stated second USB-C output profile.
The differences that matter
Multi Device Port Planning
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289
Two USB-C and one USB-A ports; both USB-C outputs list profiles up to 28V/5A; 140W maximum total output; USB-A up to 12V/1.5A.[1]
UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
Two USB-C and one USB-A ports; C1 140W max, C2 65W max, USB-A 22.5W max.[3]
What this changes: Compare the needed port and profile for each device; do not infer simultaneous delivery from individual maxima.[1, 3]
Carry Weight
Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289
630 g (22.22 oz).[1]
UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
513 g.[3]
What this changes: UGREEN lists a 117 g lower unit weight; this is a specification difference, not an overall comfort test.[1, 3]
Best for your routine
A planned device needs a USB-C output profile above 65W on the bank’s second USB-C port.
Best fit: Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), A1289
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
Anker lists up to 140W maximum on USB-C2 individually, while UGREEN lists up to 65W maximum on C2. Confirm the device’s required profile and simultaneous-output table before purchase; this is not a claim of measured charging speed.
The buyer prioritizes the lower published unit weight.
Best fit: UGREEN 145W 25,000mAh 3-Port Power Bank, PB205 / 90597A
Based on listed features, not comparative testing.
UGREEN lists 513 g versus Anker’s 630 g. This is a specification-based weight choice, not a measured comfort or overall portability result.
Value and trade-offs
One or both observed offers have eligibility conditions, so no unrestricted price difference is shown.
Because displayed offers change, compare current prices against the output profile or carry-weight trade-off that matters to your setup; this draft does not embed a price or claim a value winner.
Only current offer observations were available for this draft; there is not enough price history to recommend buying now or waiting.
Limitations
- Manufacturer maximum wattage is not a measurement of charge time or device performance. Actual results depend on the device, cable, protocol negotiation, and the power bank’s multi-port behavior.
- The exact simultaneous-output allocation was not used to rank either product; verify the official table against your intended combination.
- Anker support documentation names additional display fields including screen time, battery cycle, battery health, total input, and total output. UGREEN’s US product page says its LED display shows remaining power; that page does not establish whether other readouts are absent. Treat display detail as unresolved for a direct winner.
- No hands-on test, runtime test, or independent controlled comparison was conducted.
Questions shoppers ask
Do both power banks have the same port types?
Their manufacturer pages list two USB-C ports and one USB-A port each. The per-port maximums differ: Anker lists 140W maximum on both USB-C ports individually, while UGREEN lists 140W on C1 and 65W on C2. Check the multi-port tables for simultaneous use.
Which display shows more information?
Anker’s support page names screen-time, battery-cycle, battery-health, total-input, and total-output fields. UGREEN’s US page describes an LED display showing remaining power. That wording does not prove UGREEN lacks additional readouts, so the available sources do not settle a direct display-feature winner.
Methodology and sources
Compared the exact A1289 and PB205/90597A identities against their manufacturer product pages and Anker support documentation, focusing on per-port output profiles and listed unit weight; display documentation is treated only as an unresolved side question.
AI assistance was used to organize the sources and compare the listed specifications; no product testing was performed.
View 3 sources
- 1.Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K)Anker US · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Specifications: USB-C1/USB-C2 output profiles and 140W total output; dimensions and weight; FAQ display-field labels.: Names the Anker 737 Power Bank (PowerCore 24K), lists 24,000mAh, two USB-C and one USB-A port, USB-C1 input profiles up to 28V/5A, each USB-C output profile up to 28V/5A, 140W maximum total output, USB-A output profiles, dimensions and 630 g weight. Page FAQ names the display labels.
- 2.Why is “Screen Time”, “Battery Cycle”, “Total Input”, and “Total Output” not showing “0” on the Anker 737 PowerBank’s display?Anker Support · Official support · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Article title and opening body; explicitly discusses the Anker 737 PowerBank display fields.: Anker support explains the screen-time, battery-cycle, battery-health, total-input and total-output fields. Supports that these fields are documented for the Anker 737, not an accuracy or performance claim.
- 3.145W 3 Ports 25000mAh Power Bank for LaptopUGREEN US · Official specifications · Source checked 2026-10-19 08:41 UTC
Evidence used on this page
- Specs table, SKU 90597A: capacity, output, input, ports, dimensions, weight, and display; page description says LED display shows remaining power.: The US product page specifies SKU 90597A, 25,000mAh, 140W max USB-C1, 65W max USB-C2, 22.5W max USB-A, 65W max USB-C1 input, two USB-C plus one USB-A, dimensions 160×80×26 mm, weight 513 g, and an LED display; page copy says it shows remaining power.